Publications

Journal papers

57. T Börger, K Mmonwa, D Campbell (2023). Hazardous human–wildlife encounters, risk attitudes, and the value of shark nets for coastal recreation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1-21.
56. ED Sandorf, D Campbell, C Chorus (2022). A simple satisficing model. PLOS ONE, 17(10): e0275339.
55. M Budhathoki, D Campbell, B Belton, R Newton, S Li, W Zhang, D Little (2022). Factors influencing consumption behaviour towards aquatic food among Asian consumers: a systematic scoping review. Foods, 11: 4043.
54. H Li, D Campbell, S Erdem (2022). Measuring time preferences using stated credit repayment choices. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 20: 43-67.
53. M Budhathoki, D Campbell, B Belton, R Newton, S Li, W Zhang, D Little (2022). Factors influencing consumption behaviour towards aquatic food among Asian consumers: A systematic scoping review. Foods, 11: 4043.
52. B Danley, ED Sandorf, D Campbell (2021). Putting your best fish forward: Investigating distance decay and relative preferences for fish conservation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 108: 102475.
51. VM Toledo‐Gallegos, J Long, D Campbell, T Börger, N Hanley (2021). Spatial clustering of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72: 673-697.
50. T Börger, D Campbell, MP White, LR Elliott, LE Fleming, JK Garrett, C Hattam, S Hynes, T Lankia, T Taylor (2021). The value of blue-space recreation and perceived water quality across Europe: A contingent behaviour study. Science of The Total Environment, 771: 145597.
49. D Campbell, ED Sandorf (2021). The use of latent variable models in policy: A road fraught with peril? Bio-based and Applied Economics, 9: 305-324.
48. ED Sandorf, D Campbell (2021). The influence of information search on preference formation and choice. Project Repository Journal, 8: 78-81.
47. T Börger, QTK Ngoc, L Kuhfuss, TT Hien, N Hanley, D Campbell (2021). Preferences for coastal and marine conservation in Vietnam: Accounting for differences in individual choice set formation. Ecological Economics, 180: 106885.
46. Z Liu, N Hanley, D Campbell (2020). Linking urban air pollution with residents’ willingness to pay for greenspace: A choice experiment study in Beijing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 104: 102383.
45. I Logar, R Brouwer, D Campbell (2020). Does attribute order influence attribute-information processing in discrete choice experiments? Resource and Energy Economics, 60: 101164.
44. ED Sandorf, D Campbell (2019). Accommodating satisficing behaviour in stated choice experiments. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46: 133-162.
43. D Campbell, S Erdem (2019). Including opt-out options in discrete choice experiments: Issues to consider. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 12: 1-14.
42. G Grillia, S Notaro, D Campbell (2018). Including value orientations in choice models to estimate benefits of wildlife management policies. Ecological Economics, 151: 70-81.
41. C Chorus, B Pudane, N Mouter, D Campbell (2018). Taboo trade-off aversion: A discrete choice model and empirical analysis. Journal of Choice Modelling, 27: 37-49.
40. D Campbell, MR Mørkbak, SB Olsen (2018). The link between response time and preference, variance and processing heterogeneity in stated choice experiments. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 88: 18-34.
39. EJ Van Loo, RM Nayga Jr, D Campbell, HS Seo, W Verbeke (2018). Using eye tracking to account for attribute non-attendance in choice experiments. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 45: 333-365.
38. W Budziński, D Campbell, M Czajkowski, U Demšar, N Hanley (2017). Using geographically weighted choice models to account for the spatial heterogeneity of preferences. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69: 606-626.
37. S Erdem, D Campbell (2017). Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: A comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques. European Journal of Health Economics, 18: 1107-1123.
36. M Czajkowski, W Budziński, D Campbell, M Giergiczny, N Hanley (2017). Spatial heterogeneity of willingness to pay for forest management. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68: 705-727.
35. S van Osch, S Hynes, T O’Higgins, N Hanley, D Campbell, S Freeman (2017). Estimating the Irish public’s willingness to pay for more sustainable salmon produced by integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Marine Policy, 84: 220-227.
34. ED Sandorf, D Campbell, N Hanley (2017). Disentangling the influence of knowledge on attribute non-attendance. Journal of Choice Modelling, 24: 36-50.
33. D Campbell, MR Mørkbak, SB Olsen (2017). Response time in online stated choice experiments: the non-triviality of identifying fast and slow respondents. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6: 17-35.
32. A Longo, D Campbell (2017). The determinants of brownfields redevelopment in England. Environmental and Resource Economics, 67: 261-283.
31. K Meginnis, D Campbell (2017). Students’ preferences for attributes of postgraduate economics modules: Evidence from a multi-profile best-worst scaling survey. International Review of Economics Education, 24: 18-27.
30. D Campbell, M Boeri, E Doherty, WG Hutchinson (2015). Learning, fatigue and preference formation in discrete choice experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 119: 345-363.
29. S Erdem, D Campbell, AR Hole (2015). Accounting for attribute‐level non‐attendance in a health choice experiment: Does it matter? Health Economics, 24: 773-789.
28. D Campbell, S Erdem (2015). Position bias in best-worst scaling surveys: A case study on trust in institutions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97: 526-545.
27. MR Mørkbak, SB Olsen, D Campbell (2014). Behavioral implications of providing real incentives in stated choice experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 45: 102-116.
26. S Erdem, D Campbell, C Thompson (2014). Elimination and selection by aspects in health choice experiments: Prioritising health service innovations. Journal of Health Economics, 38: 10-22.
25. D Campbell, DA Hensher, R Scarpa (2014). Bounding WTP distributions to reflect the ‘actual’ consideration set. Journal of Choice Modelling, 11: 4-15.
24. E Doherty, D Campbell (2014). Demand for safety and regional certification of food. British Food Journal, 116(4), 676-689.
23. V O’Neill, S Hess, D Campbell (2014). A question of taste: Recognising the role of latent preferences and attitudes in analysing food choices. Food quality and preference, 32, 299-310.
22. D Campbell, SE Vedel, BJ Thorsen, JB Jacobsen (2014). Heterogeneity in the WTP for recreational access: distributional aspects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(8), 1200-1219.
21. E Doherty, D Campbell, S Hynes (2013). Models of Site‐choice for Walks in Rural Ireland: Exploring Cost Heterogeneity. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64 (2), 446-466.
20. E Doherty, D Campbell, S Hynes, TM van Rensburg (2013). Examining labelling effects within discrete choice experiments: an application to recreational site choice. Journal of Environmental Management, 125, 94-104.
19. D Campbell, E Doherty (2013). Combining discrete and continuous mixing distributions to identify niche markets for food. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40(2), 287-312.
18. S Hess, A Stathopoulos, D Campbell, V Gibson, S Caussade (2012). It’s not that I don’t care, I just don’t care very much: confounding between attribute non-attendance and taste heterogeneity. Transportation, 40, 583-607.
17. M Stithou, S Hynes, N Hanley, D Campbell (2012). Estimating the value of achieving “Good Ecological Status” in the Boyne River Catchment in Ireland using choice experiments. The Economic and Social Review, 43(3), 397–422.
16. YN Al Hamarneh, A Agus, D Campbell, GE Crealey, JC McElnay (2012). Public perceptions of coronary events risk factors: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open, 2:e001560
15. D Campbell, DA Hensher, R Scarpa (2012). Cost thresholds, cut-offs and sensitivities in stated choice analysis: identification and implications. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(3), 396-411.
14. D Campbell, CD Aravena, WG Hutchinson (2011). Cheap and expensive alternatives in stated choice experiments: are they equally considered by respondents? Applied Economics Letters, 18(8), 743-747.
13. S Hynes, D Campbell (2011). Estimating the welfare impacts of agricultural landscape change in Ireland: a choice experiment approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(8), 1019-1039.
12. S Hynes, D Campbell, P Howley (2011). A holistic vs. an attribute‐based approach to agri‐environmental policy valuation: Do welfare estimates differ? Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(2), 305-329.
11. D Campbell, DA Hensher, R Scarpa (2011). Non-attendance to attributes in environmental choice analysis: a latent class specification. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(8), 1061-1076.
10. D Campbell, WG Hutchinson, R Scarpa (2009). Using choice experiments to explore the spatial distribution of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements. Environment and Planning A, 41(1), 97-111.
9. R Scarpa, TJ Gilbride, D Campbell, DA Hensher (2009). Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 36(2), 151-174.
8. D Campbell, R Scarpa, WG Hutchinson (2008). Assessing the spatial dependence of welfare estimates obtained from discrete choice experiments. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 1(2-3), 117-126.
7. D Campbell, WG Hutchinson, R Scarpa (2008). Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41(3), 401-417.
6. D Campbell (2007). Willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements: Combining mixed logit and random‐effects models. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(3), 467-483.
5. R Scarpa, D Campbell, WG Hutchinson (2007). Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents’ rationality in a choice experiment. Land Economics, 83(4), 617-634.
4. D Campbell, WG Hutchinson, R Scarpa (2006). Quantifying the landscape benefits arising from the Rural Environment Protection Scheme: results from a public survey. Tearmann: Irish Journal of Agri-Environmental Research, 5, 1-12.

Book chapters

3. L Stevenson, D Campbell (2015). Perceived effectiveness of different methods of delivering information on energy efficiency. In R Heffron, G Little (Eds.), Delivering Energy Law and Policy in the EU and the US: A Reader, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
2. D Campbell, S Hess, R Scarpa, JM Rose (2010). Accommodating coefficient outliers in discrete choice modelling: a comparison of discrete and continuous mixing approaches. In S Hess, A Daly (Eds.), Choice Modelling: the State-Of-The-Art and the State-Of-Practice—Proceedings From the Inaugural International Choice Modelling Conference, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley.
1. D Campbell, WG Hutchinson, R Scarpa (2008). Using mixed logit models to derive individual-specific WTP estimates for landscape improvements under agri-environmental schemes: evidence from the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland. In P Koundouri, E Birol (Eds.) Choice Experiments Informing European Environmental Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.